Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order demanding GST on coaching and allied fees collected by an educational institution was sustainable in view of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and Circular No. 177/09/2022-TRU dated 03.08.2022, and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration of the exemption claim.
Analysis: The exemption entry and the circular had to be read together. The impugned order focused on the later part of the circular dealing with entrance fee, admission fee, eligibility certificates and migration certificates, but did not properly consider the earlier clarification that educational services supplied by an educational institution to its students are exempt. The question before the authority was whether the coaching services extended to enrolled students, and also the abacus-related course, fell within the exempted educational services. Since the exemption claim was not examined with reference to the relevant part of the circular, the conclusion that GST was payable could not stand and the matter required fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner an opportunity to respond.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration, with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed reply and urge all grounds on exemption.