Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported sub-assemblies were classifiable as internal combustion piston engines for the purpose of Entry 60 of Notification No. 341/76, and whether Rule 2(a) of the interpretation rules appended to the Customs Tariff Act altered that classification.
Analysis: The imported goods were held not to answer the description of internal combustion piston engines. The Court accepted the Tribunal's view that the sub-assemblies, even if considered in the light of Rule 2(a), did not fall within the notified entry. The appellant's earlier stand in relation to a show cause notice was also relied upon to reject the attempt to take a contrary position and treat the same goods as piston engines.
Conclusion: The classification claimed by the appellant was rejected and the goods were held not to fall within Entry 60 of Notification No. 341/76.