TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether receipts from sale of hardware and software packages were taxable as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12(3) of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. (ii) Whether service charges received by the assessee were taxable as fee for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12(4)(a) of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Issue (i): Whether receipts from sale of hardware and software packages were taxable as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12(3) of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Analysis: The assessee functioned as a reseller or distributor of hardware and software packages procured from third-party vendors and sold them to customers without transferring any right to use copyright. The receipts were for sale of copyrighted articles, not for use of copyright. The principle laid down in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. applied, and the earlier acceptance of the same position in the assessee's own cases reinforced the conclusion.
Conclusion: The receipts from sale of hardware and software packages were not taxable as royalty. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether service charges received by the assessee were taxable as fee for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12(4)(a) of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Analysis: Once the underlying receipts from sale of hardware and software packages were held not to be royalty, the service charges could not be treated as ancillary and subsidiary to royalty for the purposes of Article 12(4)(a). On that basis, the transfer pricing or treaty characterization adopted by the Revenue could not be sustained on the reasoning actually examined by the Assessing Officer.
Conclusion: The service charges were not taxable as fee for technical services under Article 12(4)(a). The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The additions on account of royalty and fee for technical services were deleted and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Sale of software or hardware packages by a mere reseller or distributor of copyrighted articles, without transfer of copyright rights, does not constitute royalty, and service charges cannot be taxed as fee for technical services under an ancillary-to-royalty clause when the underlying amount is not royalty.
TaxTMI 
