Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (10) TMI 334 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Revenue illegally forced TCS collection despite Form 27C; full refund with interest ordered under relevant tax rules The HC held that the Revenue acted illegally in compelling TCS collection despite the Petitioner submitting Form 27C confirming use of coal for power ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Revenue illegally forced TCS collection despite Form 27C; full refund with interest ordered under relevant tax rules

                          The HC held that the Revenue acted illegally in compelling TCS collection despite the Petitioner submitting Form 27C confirming use of coal for power generation. The ITAT quashed the default assessment against CCL for non-collection of TCS. Instead of direct refund, the Court initially directed issuance of TCS certificates for FY 2012-13 to 2017-18, which were later issued but deemed unusable by the Petitioner due to delay. Addressing unresolved issues, the Court accepted the Revenue's proposed Option No. 2, directing Respondents 3 to 5 to refund the entire TCS amount collected from the Petitioner along with interest to Respondents 1 and 2 (CCL), who must then promptly refund the Petitioner. The refund is to be completed within a specified timeframe.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Refund of Rs. 7,86,33,649 collected as TCS.
                          2. Payment of interest at 18% per annum on the amount collected.
                          3. Directions to deposit the amount along with statutory interest in the Petitioner's PAN.
                          4. Declaration of actions by Respondents as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 265.

                          Summary:

                          Issue 1: Refund of Rs. 7,86,33,649 Collected as TCS
                          The Petitioner sought a refund of Rs. 7,86,33,649 collected as Tax Collected at Source (TCS) by Respondents No. 1 and 2 for the period FY 2012-2013 to the First Quarter of FY 2017-2018. The Court noted that the relevant details required to be submitted to the Income Tax Department in Form 27 EQ were not submitted, nor was the TCS certificate issued. The Court directed the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax and the Deputy Commissioner Income Tax to appear and provide a tangible solution. Subsequently, TCS certificates were issued to the Petitioner, but the Petitioner was unable to utilize them due to the lapse in time.

                          Issue 2: Payment of Interest at 18% Per Annum
                          The Petitioner contended that interest must follow the refund of TCS collected illegally. The Court acknowledged that the Petitioner was entitled to statutory interest under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act. The Petitioner claimed that the interest component of Rs. 1,60,75,329.93 should also be restituted.

                          Issue 3: Directions to Deposit the Amount with Statutory Interest
                          Respondents No. 3 to 5 (Revenue) proposed two solutions:
                          1. The Petitioner approaches its jurisdictional Assessing Officer to get the refund of the principal amount and statutory interest.
                          2. The entire amount of Rs. 106.56 Cr be refunded by the Income Tax Department to Respondents No. 1 and 2 (CCL), who would then issue refunds to the Petitioner and others.

                          The Petitioner preferred the second option, and the Court directed that the entire sums of money collected as TCS, along with interest, be refunded by Respondents No. 3 to 5 (Revenue) to Respondents No. 1 and 2 (CCL), who should then refund the same to the Petitioner within a specified timeline.

                          Issue 4: Declaration of Actions as Illegal and Arbitrary
                          The Court recognized that the root cause of the dispute was the illegal collection of TCS by Respondents No. 1 and 2 (CCL) despite the Petitioner submitting Form 27C. The Court deemed the issuance of TCS certificates as an alternative effective relief but noted that the Petitioner could not utilize them due to the time lapse. The Court concluded that the actions of the Respondents were indeed illegal and arbitrary.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Court directed the refund of Rs. 7,86,33,649 along with interest to the Petitioner in a time-bound manner. The Petitioner was advised to move the competent Civil Court for any other interest claims. The writ application was disposed of accordingly.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found