2023 (10) TMI 300 - AT - Income Tax

Tribunal partially allows TP appeal, directs deletion of some adjustments, upholds others

Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited Versus D.C.I.T, Circle-2 (1) (1), Vadodara.

Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited Versus D.C.I.T, Circle-2 (1) (1), Vadodara. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Validity of the assessment order under Section 143(3) read with sections 144C(13) and 144B.2. Rejection of the Transfer Pricing Study Report (TPSR) and adjustments related to the purchase of raw materials and components.3. Adjustment related to receipt of data management and other related service fees.4. Adjustment related to the purchase of fixed assets and payment of trademark fees.5. Adjustment related to reimbursement of expenses received from associated enterprises (AEs).Summary:1. Validity of the Assessment Order:The first and second issues raised by the assessee were deemed general in nature and dismissed as infructuous, requiring no separate adjudication.2. Rejection of TPSR and Adjustments for Raw Materials and Components:The assessee's TPSR was rejected by the TPO due to various deficiencies, including failure to provide the Group Transfer Pricing Policy, insufficient documentation, and inappropriate selection of comparables. The TPO adopted the assessee as the tested party and proposed a downward adjustment of Rs. 9,22,28,801/-. The DRP partially upheld the TPO's findings but reduced the adjustment. The Tribunal, following its decision in the assessee's case for AY 2017-18, ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO/TPO to delete the enhancement of income on account of TP adjustment.3. Adjustment for Data Management and Related Service Fees:The TPO determined the arm's length price (ALP) for data management services as 'Nil,' citing insufficient evidence of services received. The DRP upheld this adjustment. However, the Tribunal, referencing its decision for AY 2017-18, found that the services were indeed availed and that the TNMM method applied by the assessee was appropriate. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to delete the enhancement of income on this account.4. Adjustment for Purchase of Fixed Assets and Trademark Fees:The TPO aggregated these transactions with the purchase of raw materials and components for benchmarking. The Tribunal, consistent with its earlier decision, held that once the primary transaction (purchase of raw materials) is accepted at arm's length, no further adjustments are required for the aggregated transactions. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to delete the enhancements related to fixed assets and trademark fees.5. Adjustment for Reimbursement of Expenses:The TPO recharacterized reimbursements as 'provision of support services' and added a 5% markup. The DRP upheld this adjustment. The Tribunal, following its decision for AY 2017-18, agreed that while reimbursements are international transactions requiring benchmarking, the assessee failed to determine the ALP. Thus, the Tribunal upheld the adjustment, dismissing the assessee's appeal on this ground.Conclusion:The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal directing the deletion of certain TP adjustments while upholding others. The Tribunal's decisions were largely based on consistency with its rulings in the assessee's case for the previous assessment year.