Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim protection should be granted against the demand-cum-show cause notice for service tax in relation to royalty payable on mining of minerals.
Analysis: The impugned notice was challenged on the basis that royalty on mining is not consideration for any supply and that the issue of taxability of royalty had already engaged the attention of the Supreme Court and another coordinate bench. In view of the interim protection already granted in similar matters and the pendency of the larger controversy, the petitioner was found to have made out a case for interim relief.
Conclusion: Interim stay was granted against the impugned demand-cum-show cause notice with respect to service tax.
Final Conclusion: The petition was kept pending for further proceedings while the impugned notice remained stayed until further orders.
Ratio Decidendi: When a similar taxability issue is already under interim protection in connected matters, interim relief may be granted to preserve the status quo pending adjudication.