Tribunal Invalidates Reassessment Order for Missing Notice

The Tribunal found the reassessment order under Section 147 r.w.s 143(3) invalid due to the absence of the mandatory notice under Section 143(2), as per the decision in CIT vs. Laxman Das Khandelwal. Consequently, the assessment and additions were quashed. The CIT(A)'s deletion of Rs. 1,51,46,200 was upheld due to the primary procedural lapse. Other grounds raised by both parties were not addressed. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's Cross Objection was partly allowed based on the non-issuance of the Section 143(2) notice.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the reassessment order under Section 147 r.w.s 143(3) without issuance of notice under Section 143(2).
2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 1,51,46,200 by CIT(A).
3. General grounds and procedural aspects raised by both parties.

Summary:

1. Validity of the reassessment order under Section 147 r.w.s 143(3) without issuance of notice under Section 143(2):

The primary legal issue raised by the assessee was the validity of the reassessment order under Section 147 r.w.s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the non-issuance of the mandatory notice under Section 143(2). The assessee contended that the absence of this notice rendered the entire reassessment proceedings invalid. The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Laxman Das Khandelwal, which held that the issuance of notice under Section 143(2) is a prerequisite for a valid assessment. The Tribunal verified that no such notice was issued, as confirmed by the Assessing Officer (AO) in a letter dated 22.08.2023. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the reassessment order was invalid due to the lack of this mandatory notice, thereby quashing the assessment order and the additions made thereunder.

2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 1,51,46,200 by CIT(A):

The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,51,46,200, which was based on documents/evidence seized during search proceedings. The Tribunal, however, did not delve into the merits of this issue, as the fundamental reassessment order itself was declared invalid due to the procedural lapse (non-issuance of notice under Section 143(2)). As a result, the deletion of the addition by CIT(A) stood confirmed by default.

3. General grounds and procedural aspects raised by both parties:

The Tribunal also noted other procedural aspects and general grounds raised by both parties but deemed them academic and not adjudicated upon, given the primary issue of the invalid reassessment order. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's Cross Objection, primarily on the legal ground of non-issuance of notice under Section 143(2).

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the Tribunal held that the reassessment order under Section 147 r.w.s 143(3) was invalid due to the non-issuance of the mandatory notice under Section 143(2), thereby quashing the assessment and the additions made. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's Cross Objection was partly allowed.

---