Treaty override on royalty receipts: transmission-rights fees not taxable as royalty, and TDS credit must be verified.

Licence fee for live and non-live transmission rights was held not to be royalty under the Income-tax Act and the India-Australia DTAA, because live telecast or broadcast rights did not amount to transfer of copyright and a unilateral domestic expansion of the royalty definition could not override the treaty. Tournament fee and reimbursement of dinner tickets were also not sustained as royalty, since the assessment did not record any clear, reasoned basis linking those receipts to royalty. Credit for tax deducted at source was directed to be verified and allowed in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether licence fee received for live and non-live transmission rights was taxable as royalty under the Income-tax Act and the India-Australia tax treaty; (ii) whether tournament fee and reimbursement of dinner tickets could be treated as royalty; (iii) whether credit of tax deducted at source had to be granted.

Issue (i): Whether licence fee received for live and non-live transmission rights was taxable as royalty under the Income-tax Act and the India-Australia tax treaty.

Analysis: The addition was examined in the light of binding precedent holding that live telecast or broadcast rights do not amount to transfer of copyright and that payment for such transmission is not royalty. It was further held that a unilateral amendment to the domestic definition of royalty cannot be imported into a treaty unless the treaty itself is correspondingly amended. In the absence of any such amendment to the applicable DTAA, the expanded domestic definition could not govern the receipt in question.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and the addition on this count was deleted.

Issue (ii): Whether tournament fee and reimbursement of dinner tickets could be treated as royalty.

Analysis: The assessment order did not record any clear and reasoned basis explaining how the amount was royalty, and the final order merely repeated the draft view. In the absence of a substantiated finding linking the receipt to royalty, the addition could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and the addition was deleted.

Issue (iii): Whether credit of tax deducted at source had to be granted.

Analysis: The claim for credit required verification of the factum of tax withholding and consequential granting of credit in accordance with law.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee to the extent of a direction to verify the withholding and allow credit as admissible.

Final Conclusion: The Tribunal sustained relief on the substantive royalty additions and directed verification and grant of tax credit, leaving only a consequential interest ground and a premature penalty ground without substantive adjudication.

Ratio Decidendi: A domestic amendment expanding the definition of royalty does not alter treaty obligations unless the treaty is correspondingly amended, and payments for live telecast or broadcasting rights, absent transfer of copyright or a treaty-consistent basis, do not constitute royalty.

---