Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of Assessee on TDS and Interest, Unsold Flats taxability</h1> <h3>Sukhwani Developers Versus The Pr. CIT (Central), Pune</h3> The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune partly allowed the Assessee's appeal, upholding the order under section 263 regarding TDS and Interest on TDS. The ... Revision u/s 263 by CIT - two views on this impugned issue - Annual Letting Value of completed stock of Project Elmwood should have been added to the income of the assessee - AO took a view of not taxing it under the head Income from House property - HELD THAT:- When two views are legally possible and AO adopts one view the Assessment Order cannot be said to be erroneous for the CIT to invoke jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Act. See Amitabh Bachchan [2016 (5) TMI 493 - SUPREME COURT], Mepco Industries Ltd. [2006 (11) TMI 164 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] and Future Corporate Resources Ltd [2021 (10) TMI 175 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] In the case under consideration the AO has adopted one of the legally possible view qua Unsold Flats shown as closing stock. Therefore, the Assessment Order is not erroneous qua unsold flats shown as Stock. TDS and Interest on TDS - AR accepted that there was no inquiry by the AO on the issue of TDS and interest on TDS. Accordingly we hold that the Assessment Order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue with reference to the issue of TDS as AO failed to carry out necessary verification and on the issue of Interest on TDS. Accordingly the, order u/s. 263 is upheld qua TDS claim and Interest on TDS. Decided partly in favour of assessee. Issues Involved:The judgment involves the following issues: 1. Validity of the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Treatment of TDS and Interest on TDS in the assessment order. 3. Taxability of Annual Letting Value of completed stock of Project Elmwood under the head 'Income from House Property'.Issue 1: Validity of the order under section 263:The Assessee challenged the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) as perverse, unlawful, and not sustainable in law. The Principal Commissioner invoked section 263 on grounds related to TDS, Interest on TDS, and taxability of unsold flats. The Assessee contended that the AO did not consider their detailed submissions in response to the notice under section 263. The Tribunal upheld the order under section 263 concerning the TDS claim and Interest on TDS due to the AO's failure to verify these issues.Issue 2: Treatment of TDS and Interest on TDS:The Assessee, a builder, had claimed TDS of Rs. 10,34,119 without offering the corresponding income for tax, which the AO did not verify. The Tribunal found the Assessment Order erroneous regarding the TDS claim and Interest on TDS due to the lack of necessary verification by the AO. The Assessee's representative accepted the absence of inquiry by the AO on these issues, leading to the Tribunal upholding the order under section 263 concerning TDS and Interest on TDS.Issue 3: Taxability of Annual Letting Value of completed stock:The Principal Commissioner contended that the Annual Letting Value of completed stock should have been added to the Assessee's income based on a decision of the Delhi High Court. The Tribunal noted that during the assessment proceedings, the AO was aware of the closing stock of ready flats but decided not to tax them under 'Income from House Property.' Given the existence of two legally possible views on the taxability of these flats, the Assessment Order was not deemed erroneous on this ground. The Tribunal referred to relevant case law and held that when two legally possible views exist and the AO adopts one, the Assessment Order cannot be considered erroneous. Consequently, the Tribunal partially allowed the Assessee's appeal on this issue.In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune partly allowed the Assessee's appeal, upholding the order under section 263 regarding TDS and Interest on TDS, while ruling in favor of the Assessee on the taxability of unsold flats under 'Income from House Property' based on the legally possible view adopted by the Assessing Officer.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found