Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether brokerage or commission received for services relating to public issue of equity shares, bonds and other IPO-related investment products was liable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service.
Analysis: The brokerage and commission were held to arise from services connected with initial public offerings and public issues, not from trading of listed securities. The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions that such receipts do not fall within the scope of Business Auxiliary Service for the relevant period. It also relied on the settled view that only commission or brokerage in the nature contemplated by the charging and valuation provisions can be taxed, and that receipts collected for onward payment to statutory or authorised bodies cannot be brought into the taxable base. The demand was therefore unsustainable, and the penalties founded on the same demand also could not survive.
Conclusion: The receipt was not taxable as Business Auxiliary Service, and the demand and connected penalties were set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was held unsustainable and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief as available in law.
Ratio Decidendi: Brokerage or commission earned for IPO and public-issue related services, where it is not consideration for taxable service within the statutory definition, cannot be subjected to service tax or included in the taxable value by implication.