1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Revenue's appeals dismissed as assessment orders annulled for lack of incriminating material. CIT(A) decisions upheld.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeals as the assessment orders were annulled due to the lack of incriminating material found at the time ... Assessment u/s 153A - incriminating material found at the time of search or not? - HELD THAT:- Disallowances made by the AO are devoid of any incriminating material found at the time of search, CIT(A) respectfully following the binding decision in the case of Kabul Chawla [2015 (9) TMI 80 - DELHI HIGH COURT] quashed the assessment order. As in the case of Abhisar Buildwell [2023 (4) TMI 1056 - SUPREME COURT] has upheld the decision of the Honβble Delhi High Court, therefore, there remain no grievance for the revenue now. We do not find any error or infirmity in the findings of the CIT(A) qua ground No.2, therefore, the captioned appeals by the revenue are dismissed. Issues Involved: The issues involved in this case are related to the assessment orders for multiple assessment years (A.Y. 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12) challenged by the revenue in four separate appeals before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi.ITA No.5042/Del/2017 A.Y. 2008-09:1. The CIT(A) allowed the appeal of the assessee without truly appreciating the factual matrix of the case.2. The reliance on the case of CIT Vs Kabul Chawla was questioned, specifically regarding the interference with completed assessment u/s 153A of the Act.3. Deletion of addition made by AO on account of bogus purchases from certain traders was contested.4. Acceptance of additional evidence in appellate proceedings without proper verification from assessment records was challenged.5. Disallowance of deduction u/s 80IB(4) of the Act was deleted by the CIT(A).6. Disallowance of manufacturing expenses was deleted by the CIT(A).7. The plea for rejection of books of account u/s. 145(3) of the IT Act, 1961 was allowed by the CIT(A).8. The assessment order was annulled based on the lack of incriminating material found at the time of search, following the decision in the case of Kabul Chawla.The Hon'ble Apex Court upheld the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Abhisar Buildwell, leading to the dismissal of the revenue's appeals due to no error found in the CIT(A)'s findings regarding ground No.2.Conclusion:The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeals as the assessment orders were annulled due to the lack of incriminating material found at the time of search. The decisions of the CIT(A) regarding various grounds were upheld, and no errors were found in the findings. The appeals were disposed of based on the precedents set by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and the Hon'ble Apex Court.