Tribunal grants concessionary duty rate in Pepsico India appeal

The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd., setting aside the Commissioner of Central Excise, Puducherry's order denying them the concessional duty rate under Notification No. 1/2011-CE. The Tribunal held that the appellant's reversal of CENVAT credit on inputs and input services for the disputed goods made them eligible for the 1% duty rate. Citing legal precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in Chandrapur Magnets Pvt. Ltd. case, the Tribunal emphasized that once ineligible credit is reversed, exemption from duty cannot be denied.

---

---

Issues involved:
The issues involved in the judgment are the availment of CENVAT credit on inputs and input services while claiming a concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 1/2011-CE dated 1.3.2011 for 'fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks', and the subsequent denial of the concessional rate by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Puducherry.

Comprehensive Details:

Issue 1: Availment of CENVAT credit and denial of concessional rate:
The appellant, M/s. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd., appealed against the Order in Original passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Puducherry, which denied them the benefit of the effective rate of duty of 1% under Notification No. 1/2011-CE dated 1.3.2011 for 'fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks'. The appellant had cleared these goods at the 1% duty rate but had availed CENVAT credit on inputs and input services, which led to the Commissioner proposing duty payment at the effective rate of 5%. The appellant argued that they had reversed the CENVAT credit amount and complied with the notification conditions, making them eligible for the concessional rate. They cited relevant case laws and the Tribunal judgment in support of their contention.

Issue 2: Tribunal's Decision and Legal Precedents:
The Tribunal, after considering the facts and legal arguments presented, found in favor of the appellant. They noted that the appellant had reversed the CENVAT credit availed on inputs and input services related to the disputed goods, as per the Range Officer's verification report. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Chandrapur Magnets Pvt. Ltd. case, emphasizing that once the ineligible credit is reversed, the claim for exemption of duty cannot be denied. They also cited the Tribunal's decision in Jai Beverage Pvt. Ltd. case, supporting the appellant's eligibility for the concessional rate under Notification No. 1/2011-CE. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential relief to the appellant.

Separate Judgement:
The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) and Hon'ble Shri M. Ajit Kumar, Member (Technical) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI.

This summary provides a detailed overview of the issues involved in the legal judgment, the arguments presented by the parties, the Tribunal's decision, and the legal precedents cited during the proceedings.

---