Tribunal directs deletion of excess jewellery additions, excludes family jewellery from assessee's income.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete additions for excess gold and diamond jewellery found during the search and assessed in the assessee's hands. The Tribunal held that jewellery found with family members should not be assessed in the assessee's hands. Additionally, the AO was directed to consider the sale proceeds of silver articles for purchasing jewellery.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of additions made under Section 69A for excess gold and diamond jewellery.
2. Consideration of jewellery found in the possession of family members.
3. Application of telescopic view for sale proceeds of silver articles.

Summary:

1. Validity of Additions under Section 69A for Excess Jewellery:
The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) rws 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, with additions based on the difference between the quantum of jewellery as per Wealth Tax Return and the quantum found during the search operation. The Assessing Officer (AO) added Rs. 1,28,83,999 for excess gold jewellery and Rs. 32,60,474 for excess diamond jewellery. The CIT(A) allowed relief for jewellery declared in wealth tax returns and for certain quantities belonging to the assessee's wife and son but confirmed the balance excess jewellery found during the search.

2. Consideration of Jewellery Found with Family Members:
The assessee contended that jewellery found in the possession of his son and wife should not be assessed in his hands as they are separate legal entities and assessed to income tax independently. The CIT(A) rejected this argument, stating that since they lived in a joint family, the jewellery found during the search needed to be explained by the assessee. However, the Tribunal held that excess jewellery found in the possession of Shri. Ajeeth Challani and Smt. Shobha Challani should not be assessed in the hands of the assessee, directing the AO to delete these additions.

3. Application of Telescopic View for Sale Proceeds of Silver Articles:
The assessee claimed that the sale value of silver during AY 2011-12 was utilized for purchasing gold and diamond jewellery. The AO did not allow this claim due to the absence of bills and vouchers. The Tribunal found that the AO erred in disregarding the assessee's argument, as the AO had taxed capital gains from the sale of silver articles. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow telescopic benefit towards the source available from the sale proceeds of silver articles for the excess gold and diamond jewellery found during the search.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the AO to delete the additions made towards excess gold and diamond jewellery found during the search and assessed in the hands of the assessee. The order was pronounced on 28th June 2023 at Chennai.

---