GST not applicable on free warranty replacement goods supplied without additional consideration under warranty terms

The AAR held that GST is not leviable on goods supplied as free replacement during warranty period without consideration. The applicant supplied elastomeric pads free of cost under warranty terms to railway authorities. The ruling established that warranty replacements involve no separate consideration as charges were already included in original supply value. No GST is chargeable on replacement goods during warranty period since they have nil value and no additional consideration is received. The decision was supported by precedent from Tamil Nadu AAR regarding warranty replacements.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Tax liability under GST for goods supplied as free replacement under guarantee period without consideration.

Analysis:
1. The applicant, a manufacturer and supplier of Railways locomotive parts, sought an advance ruling on the tax liability under GST for goods supplied as free replacement under a guarantee period without consideration.
2. The applicant highlighted that under the guarantee and free replacement clause, no consideration is chargeable from the buyer for the replaced goods, as the consideration was included in the original supply to Indian Railways.
3. The applicant argued that replacement items should be treated as part of the original contract, citing a Tribunal order and the Apex Court's affirmation in a relevant case.
4. The Jurisdictional GST Officer provided comments confirming the applicant's registration, manufacturing activities, and applicable GST rates for the goods supplied to Indian Railways.
5. The issue was previously addressed in an Advance Ruling in Bengaluru, Karnataka, and the AAR concluded that no GST is chargeable on replacement parts provided without consideration under warranty.
6. The Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh, discussed the provisions of the CGST Act and the UPGST Act, emphasizing exceptions to the requirement of consideration for a supply to be treated as a supply under GST.
7. The ruling authority examined the warranty clause provided by the South Central Railway and the applicable GST rates for the goods supplied to Indian Railways.
8. Referring to Schedule I of the CGST Act, the authority noted that certain activities, including the permanent transfer of business assets and supply between related persons, are treated as supplies even without consideration.
9. The authority concluded that no GST is leviable on goods supplied as free replacement under a guarantee period without consideration, aligning with previous rulings and CBIC guidance.

Conclusion:
The Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh, ruled that GST is not applicable if goods are supplied as free replacement under a guarantee period without any consideration. This ruling is valid within the jurisdiction of the authority, subject to the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017.

---