Rectification applications under GST are not defeated by clerical vehicle-number errors, while alleged connivance may be examined after hearing the party.

Rectification under Section 161 of the Karnataka GST Act may still be considered where the application contains clerical errors in the vehicle number, if the substance of the request remains identifiable. The connected issue of alleged connivance between the petitioner and the transporter should be examined by the authority after giving the affected party an opportunity to participate in the enquiry. The petitioner is to support the request by affidavit, provide necessary particulars, and appear before the third respondent so the enquiry can be effectively completed. The matter is to be dealt with through simultaneous consideration of rectification and connivance, without any merits determination on confiscation.

---

---

Issues: Whether the rectification application could be considered notwithstanding typographical errors in the vehicle number, and whether the question of connivance between the petitioner and the transporter could be examined with an opportunity to the petitioner to participate in the enquiry.

Analysis: The vehicle confiscation was under Section 130 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the petitioner invoked Section 161 of that Act for rectification. The Court noted that the rectification application contained an incorrect vehicle number in some places, but that this did not prevent consideration of the application as a whole. It also found that for complete adjudication, the respondents should examine the question whether there was connivance between the petitioner and the transporter. The petitioner was required to support the request by affidavit, furnish necessary details, and appear before the third respondent so that the enquiry could be effectively conducted.

Conclusion: The rectification application was directed to be adjudicated along with the question of connivance, and the petitioner was directed to participate in the enquiry and appear before the third respondent.

Final Conclusion: The petition was disposed of with directions for simultaneous consideration of rectification and connivance, without any adjudication on the merits of confiscation.

Ratio Decidendi: A rectification request is not defeated by clerical errors if the substance of the application is identifiable, and the related question of connivance may be decided by the authority after giving the affected party a fair opportunity to participate.

---