High Court: Bagasse is agricultural waste, not a product. Cenvat Credit Rules inapplicable. Circular invalidated.

The High Court ruled that bagasse is an agricultural waste, not a manufactured product, making Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 inapplicable to bagasse and electricity generated from it. The court held that despite the 2015 amendment to Rule 6, bagasse remained exempt. The Circular treating bagasse as exempted goods was invalidated, following decisions by other High Courts and the Supreme Court's dismissal of a related case. The impugned show-cause notice and demand statement were deemed illegal due to the quashed Circular and previous dropped demands, leading to their quashing.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether bagasse is an agricultural waste or a manufactured product.
2. Applicability of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 to bagasse.
3. Validity of the Circular No. 1027/15/2016-CX dated 25.04.2016.
4. Legality of the impugned show-cause notice and statement of demand.

Summary:

Issue 1: Whether bagasse is an agricultural waste or a manufactured product.
The High Court reiterated the Apex Court's decision in DSCL Sugar Ltd. (2015) that bagasse is an agricultural waste and not a manufactured product. Consequently, Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, was inapplicable to bagasse and electricity generated using bagasse.

Issue 2: Applicability of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 to bagasse.
The Court noted that Rule 6 was amended on 01.03.2015 to include non-excisable goods cleared for consideration as exempted goods. However, the Court held that despite the 2015 amendment, bagasse remained an agricultural waste and not a manufactured product. Therefore, Rule 6 was inapplicable to bagasse.

Issue 3: Validity of the Circular No. 1027/15/2016-CX dated 25.04.2016.
The Court observed that the Circular, which treated bagasse as exempted goods for the purpose of reversal of credit of input and input services, was quashed by the Allahabad High Court in Balarampur Chini Mills Ltd. and followed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Indian Sucrose Limited. The Apex Court confirmed this by dismissing the SLP against the Punjab and Haryana High Court's decision. The Circular was subsequently rescinded by the Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs on 07.07.2022.

Issue 4: Legality of the impugned show-cause notice and statement of demand.
The Court held that the impugned show-cause notice and statement of demand, based on the quashed and rescinded Circular, were illegal and without jurisdiction. Additionally, the demand for the period October 2015 to March 2016 had already been dropped and attained finality, thus barring further demands for the same period under the principles of res judicata and issue estoppel.

Order:
(i) The petition is allowed.
(ii) The impugned Show Cause Notice dated 30.03.2017 and the Statement of Demand dated 25.10.2017 are quashed.

---