TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal grants exemption to manufacturer for supplying essential goods for Mega Power Project</h1> <h3>M/s Unique Transmission (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata I</h3> M/s Unique Transmission (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata I - TMI Issues:The judgment involves the denial of benefit under Notification No.21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002 Sl.No.400 (as amended).Facts and Analysis:The appellant, a manufacturer of shaft couplings, cleared goods under the benefit of the mentioned Notification to M/s Jindal Power Limited for a Mega Power Project. The notification specified conditions for exemption related to specific charter headings. A show-cause notice was issued to deny the benefit, leading to the demand for duty confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant contested, citing precedents where similar benefits were allowed. The Tribunal observed that the appellant supplied goods for a Mega Power Project, meeting certification requirements, and referred to previous cases where exemption was granted under similar circumstances.Legal Interpretation:The Tribunal compared relevant conditions from different notifications to determine eligibility for exemption. It noted that the goods supplied were for a Mega Power Project, meeting certification requirements, and that the appellant's role as a sub-contractor did not disqualify them from the benefit. The Tribunal emphasized that the goods supplied were essential for the project execution, aligning with the notification's intent. It concluded that the impugned order was not in line with the law and set it aside, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.Conclusion:Based on the analysis of the notification conditions and the appellant's role in supplying goods for a Mega Power Project, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant's claim for exemption. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
TaxTMI 