Customs valuation dispute: contemporaneous import data and rule 12(2) justified rejection of declared value and reassessment.

Declared assessable value of imported goods was lawfully rejected where the proper officer entertained reasonable doubt under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 after comparing contemporaneous imports of identical or similar goods from the same country in comparable quantities. The importer was queried, NIDB contemporaneous data was shared, and a personal hearing was afforded, satisfying rule 12(2). Because the comparable imports showed substantially higher values and matched in description, origin, and commercial quantity, re-determination of value on the basis of contemporaneous import data was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the declared assessable value of the imported goods was correctly rejected and the value was lawfully re-determined on the basis of contemporaneous imports under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007.

Analysis: The imported goods were self-assessed under section 17(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, but the proper officer formed a doubt about the declared value because identical or similar goods imported at or about the same time from the same country and in comparable quantities reflected substantially higher values. The importer was given queries, the contemporaneous NIDB data was shared, and an opportunity of personal hearing was provided. The record showed that the requirements of rule 12(2) were satisfied, and the declared value could be rejected when reasonable doubt existed as to truth or accuracy. Since the comparable imports were of the same description, from the same origin, and in broadly comparable commercial quantities, the reassessment by reference to contemporaneous values was upheld.

Conclusion: The rejection of the declared value and its re-determination on the basis of contemporaneous import data was valid, and the appeal failed.

---