No Willful Contempt Found, Petitioner Criticized, Cost Imposed

The court found no willful contempt by the respondent and criticized the petitioner's actions. A cost of Rs.25,000 was imposed on the petitioner for wrongly troubling the Managing Director. As subsequent applications were considered and rejected, the court concluded that no contempt was committed by the respondent. The contempt petition was closed with the cost payable to the respondent within a month.

---

---

Issues: Alleged disobedience of court orders, Contempt petition, Compliance with court order, Impleading higher officials in contempt petition

In this case, a contempt petition was filed alleging the disobedience of court orders dated 21.04.2021 in a writ petition. The court had directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner's offer within four weeks. However, the petitioner claimed non-compliance, leading to the contempt petition. The Deputy General Manager of the Industrial Financial Corporation of India Ltd. in Chennai was initially directed, but the Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer from New Delhi was wrongly impleaded as a party. The Managing Director appeared before the court, stating that subsequent representations with improved offers were considered and rejected. The court noted that the Managing Director's inclusion was unnecessary and a misuse of the legal process. It emphasized that higher officials need not be summoned unless necessary. The court found no willful contempt by the respondent and criticized the petitioner's actions. The court imposed a cost of Rs.25,000 on the petitioner for wrongly troubling the Managing Director. As the subsequent applications were considered and rejected, the court concluded that no contempt was committed by the respondent. The contempt petition was closed with the cost payable to the respondent within a month.

---