Tribunal Grants Partial Relief to Assessee on Income Tax Disallowances

The Tribunal partly allowed all appeals of the assessee regarding disallowances under Sections 43B(f) and 14A of the Income Tax Act. For Section 43B(f), the Tribunal directed the AO to verify the actual payment basis for leave encashment, following the precedent set in TV Today Network Ltd. Regarding Section 14A, the Tribunal instructed the AO to rework the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) considering only investments yielding tax-free income, as per the Delhi High Court's decision in Cargo Motors (P.) Ltd vs. DCIT. The issues were sent back to the AO for re-evaluation, allowing the assessee's grounds partly for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under Section 43B(f) of the Income Tax Act.
2. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.

Summary:

Issue 1: Disallowance under Section 43B(f) of the Income Tax Act

Facts: The assessee, engaged in the business of publishing and trading of books and magazines, filed returns declaring losses for various assessment years. The primary issue for A.Y. 2014-15 was the disallowance of Rs. 42,44,760/- on account of leave encashment under Section 43B(f) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the provision for leave encashment, citing the Hon'ble Supreme Court's stay on the Calcutta High Court's decision in Exide Industries Ltd., which had struck down Section 43B(f) as unconstitutional.

Tribunal's Decision: The Tribunal directed the AO to verify the assessee's claim that the leave encashment payments were made in subsequent years and to allow the deduction under Section 43B on an actual payment basis. This decision was based on the precedent set in the case of TV Today Network Ltd. The Tribunal restored the issue back to the AO for verification and appropriate action, thereby allowing the ground of the assessee for statistical purposes.

Issue 2: Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act

Facts: For A.Y. 2012-13, the AO made a disallowance of Rs. 55,87,882/- under Section 14A, following Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules. The assessee argued that the disallowance should be restricted to Rs. 13,03,214/- based on revised workings and judicial pronouncements. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision but restricted the disallowance to the assessee's suo moto disallowance of Rs. 55,87,882/-.

Tribunal's Decision: The Tribunal examined the assessee's claim that investments were made out of interest-free funds and noted that the aggregate shareholders' funds were less than the total investments. Therefore, the presumption that investments were made from interest-free funds did not apply. However, the Tribunal directed the AO to rework the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) by considering only those investments that yielded tax-free income, in line with the Delhi High Court's decision in Cargo Motors (P.) Ltd vs. DCIT. The issue was restored back to the AO for re-evaluation, allowing the ground of the assessee partly for statistical purposes.

Combined Result:

All appeals of the assessee were partly allowed, with directions to the AO for further verification and re-evaluation in accordance with the law.

---