Appeal partly allowed, delay condoned, employees' contributions issue allowed. Uncertified bills addition upheld, rectification limited.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing and allowing the issue of disallowance of employees' contributions to EPF/ESI. The Tribunal upheld the decision on the addition of uncertified bills, emphasizing rectification under Section 154 is limited to correcting errors apparent on record. The appeal outcome was pronounced on 30th March 2023.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
2. Addition on account of uncertified bills.
3. Disallowance of employees' contribution to EPF/ESI.
4. Scope of rectification under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act.

Condonation of Delay:

The assessee filed the appeal with a delay of 142 days, citing that the order was not perused by the staff and was noticed only in February. The Tribunal condoned the delay, emphasizing substantial justice over technicality, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Collector Land Acquisition Vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors.

Addition on Account of Uncertified Bills:

The assessee contested the addition of Rs. 29,39,56,585/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) for uncertified bills. The Tribunal noted that the AO did not consider the reconciliation of bills and credit notes presented by the assessee. However, the Tribunal held that the addition could not be considered a mistake apparent on record under Section 154 and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision.

Disallowance of Employees' Contribution to EPF/ESI:

The AO disallowed Rs. 9,30,900/- for delayed remittance of employees' contributions to EPF/ESI. The Tribunal found this to be a mistake apparent on record, as the AO incorporated the addition without considering details during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal allowed the appeal on this ground and granted the assessee liberty to raise the issue before the CIT(A) in the pending appeal against the assessment order dated 17.05.2021.

Scope of Rectification under Section 154:

The Tribunal emphasized that the scope of rectification under Section 154 is limited to correcting errors apparent on record. The CIT(A) held that the addition of Rs. 29,39,56,585/- and the disallowance of Rs. 9,30,900/- did not constitute mistakes apparent on record. The Tribunal agreed with this view, except for the disallowance related to employees' contributions to EPF/ESI.

Conclusion:

The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal condoning the delay and allowing the appeal concerning the disallowance of employees' contributions to EPF/ESI. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision regarding the addition of uncertified bills.

Order pronounced in the open court on 30th March, 2023.

---