Tribunal affirms Assessing Officer's jurisdiction under Income Tax Act, rejects indexation claim due to lack of evidence.

The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, determining that the registered sale deed recovered during a search operation pertained to the assessee, contradicting the assessee's claims. The Tribunal also dismissed the assessee's claim for indexation on the cost of improvement due to lack of concrete evidence supporting the alleged improvements. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed both appeals and stay applications filed by the assessee in a decision pronounced on 23rd March 2023.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the Order under Section 153C read with Section 144 of the Income Tax Act.
2. Denial of the benefit of indexation on the cost of improvement incurred.

Summary:

Ground No. 1:
The first ground raised by the assessee is general in nature and requires no adjudication.

Ground No. 2: Validity of the Order under Section 153C read with Section 144
The assessee argued that the registered sale deed recovered during the search and seizure operation was not an incriminating document and did not pertain to the assessee. The document was public and related to M/s. Optimus Pharma Pvt. Ltd., not the assessee. The assessee relied on various case laws to support this argument.

The Revenue countered that the material seized from the residential premises of Sri D. Srinivasa Reddy was related to M/s. SRD Exports, for which the assessee is the Proprietor. The registered sale deed mentioned the assessee's name and was used to claim long-term capital gain and indexation cost. The Revenue argued that the document was rightly relied upon by the Assessing Officer.

The Tribunal examined Section 153C of the Act, which allows the Assessing Officer to proceed against a person if seized documents pertain to them. The Tribunal found that the registered sale deed related to the assessee and showed the property as a vacant plot, contradicting the assessee's claim of construction and improvement. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction under Section 153C and dismissed this ground.

Ground No. 3: Denial of Indexation on Cost of Improvement
The assessee claimed that the cost of improvements, including construction, was incurred and supported by photographs and a certificate from an Architect. The Revenue argued that the site plans annexed to the sale deed showed no construction, and the assessee failed to provide concrete evidence of the claimed improvements during the assessment proceedings.

The Tribunal noted that the sale deed showed the property as a vacant plot with only a small shed, and no substantial construction was mentioned. The Tribunal agreed with the lower authorities that the assessee failed to provide contemporaneous evidence of improvements. The Tribunal upheld the partial relief granted by the CIT(A) and dismissed the remaining claim for indexation on the cost of improvement.

Decision:
The Tribunal dismissed both appeals and the stay applications filed by the assessee. The order was pronounced in the Open Court on 23rd March 2023.

---