Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disallowance of employees' contribution towards PF and ESI, deposited after the due date under the relevant welfare statutes but before the due date for filing the return, could be sustained under section 36(1)(va) and adjusted in intimation under section 143(1)(a)(iv).
Analysis: The contribution by employees to the relevant welfare funds forms part of the employer's income under section 2(24)(x) and is allowable as deduction only if deposited within the due date prescribed under the respective welfare enactments. The later filing of the return under section 139(1) does not enlarge the time for payment under section 36(1)(va). The Court also held that where the audit report clearly discloses the due date and the actual date of payment, the resulting disallowance is within the scope of the prima facie adjustment contemplated by section 143(1)(a)(iv). The assessee's reliance on earlier High Court decisions could not prevail in view of the binding law declared by the Supreme Court in Checkmate Services.
Conclusion: The disallowance was validly made and sustained; the issue was decided against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Employees' contribution to PF and ESI is deductible only on compliance with the due date under the relevant welfare law, and a clear delay reflected in the audit report can be adjusted while processing the return under section 143(1)(a)(iv).