Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned detention and consequential orders under the GST enactments were liable to be set aside for want of opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The proceedings showed that the hearing recorded on 24.03.2023 related to the earlier notice proposing action under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. A revised notice in Form GST MOV-07, invoking the applicable provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, was issued on the same day, but no opportunity was granted to the petitioner to answer that revised notice. The petitioner was therefore not heard on the basis on which the impugned orders were ultimately passed.
Conclusion: The orders were vitiated for breach of natural justice and were set aside; the petitioner was permitted to appear, file a reply, and have the matter decided afresh.