Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Revenue Authorities Must Address SABKA VISHWAS Scheme Payment Claim Despite Deadline, Court Orders Prompt Action</h1> <h3>S. Vasanthakumar Versus The Commissioner, O/o. the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Madurai, The Deputy Commissioner, O/o. the Deputy Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Madurai, The Joint Commissioner, Member Designated Committee under Sabka Vishawas, (Legacy dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019), O/o. the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Madurai, The Assistant Commissioner, Member Designated Committee under Sabka Vishawas, (Legacy dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019), O/o. the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Madurai</h3> The HC directed the Central Revenue Authorities to consider the petitioner's representation for payment under the SABKA VISHWAS Scheme, 2019, despite the ... Seeking Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider his representation to accept the payment in terms of SABKA VISHWAS (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 towards Full and Final Settlement of tax dues, within the time stipulated - seeking to revoke the proceedings of the Central Revenue Authorities - HELD THAT:- It is no doubt true that the scheme in question has a shelf life and it is not within the jurisdiction of the respondent to extend the time. However, it is also seen that the Court exercises its jurisdiction to give directions to the taxing authorities to consider receiving the payment belatedly to ensure that the assessee abides by the duty caused upon him to make the payment of taxes. Taking a cue from this earlier precedence and with the idea of bringing about the via media, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:- The respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.02.2023 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. While considering the representation of the petitioner, the respondents shall bear in mind the fact that the entire amount had been paid by the petitioner on 30.07.2020 through RTGS. Petition disposed off. Issues involved:The issues involved in the judgment are the petitioner seeking Mandamus to direct consideration of representation for payment under SABKA VISHWAS Scheme, 2019 and revocation of proceedings by Central Revenue Authorities.Details of the judgment:Issue 1: Representation for payment under SABKA VISHWAS Scheme, 2019The petitioner, engaged in business services, was found due service tax by the authority before the GST regime. Subsequently, under the SABKA VISHWAS Scheme, 2019, the petitioner was directed to pay a sum towards service dues and penalty. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, the petitioner remitted the service tax dues, believing compliance. However, a notice from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs revealed non-crediting of the amount. The petitioner then sent a Demand Draft and representation to consider the belated payment under the scheme. The respondents did not act on the representation, leading to the freezing of the petitioner's account.Issue 2: Court's DecisionThe petitioner's counsel argued the petitioner's bona fide compliance by remitting the demanded amount and willingness to pay interest. The Standing Counsel for respondents contended that the scheme's time limit cannot be extended and questioned the petitioner's awareness of the non-transfer of funds. The Court acknowledged the scheme's limited duration but directed the authorities to consider the petitioner's representation within one month, emphasizing the petitioner's payment made through RTGS in 2020. No costs were awarded in the judgment.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found