High Court overturns lower court's conviction, acquits petitioner, orders refund of bail bond/fine. Emphasizes lack of enforceable debt.

The High Court allowed the Criminal Revision Case, setting aside the lower court's conviction and sentence. The petitioner was acquitted, and any bail bond executed or fine paid was ordered to be refunded. The judgment highlighted the lack of legally enforceable debt and vicarious liability, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioner.

---

---

Issues involved:
The judgment involves the conviction and sentence of the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, along with the order of compensation to the respondent.

Details of the judgment:

Issue 1: Alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
The respondent lodged a complaint against the petitioner for issuing a cheque on behalf of two companies, M/s.Trial Tex and TKT Corporation, as a guarantor for job work. The cheque was dishonored, leading to legal proceedings.

Issue 2: Burden of proof and evidence
The trial court found the accused guilty based on oral and documentary evidence presented by both parties. The petitioner rebutted the presumption of legally enforceable debt by issuing a reply notice and presenting evidence.

Issue 3: Petitioner's defense
The petitioner claimed to be an adviser of Central Excise, Customs, and Foreign Trade, denying any connection with the two companies or standing as a guarantor. He argued that the respondent's misconduct was acknowledged by customs authorities, and the alleged companies were non-existent.

Issue 4: Vicarious liability and legal enforceable debt
The petitioner contended that as a guarantor, he was not liable for any enforceable debt to the respondent. The absence of a statutory notice to the companies and failure to involve them in the legal proceedings raised doubts on the petitioner's liability.

Judgment Outcome:
The High Court allowed the Criminal Revision Case, setting aside the lower court's conviction and sentence. The petitioner was acquitted, and any bail bond executed or fine paid was ordered to be refunded. The judgment highlighted the lack of legally enforceable debt and vicarious liability, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioner.

---