Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether footwear sold in bulk to military and paramilitary institutions could claim valuation under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the basis of maximum retail price affixation and the relevant notification.
Analysis: Valuation under Section 4A applies only when the goods are notified and are of the kind to which the packaged commodities regime applies, together with the statutory requirement to declare retail price on the package. The applicable legal framework under the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 exempts sales to institutional consumers. The purchasers in the present transactions were institutional consumers purchasing in bulk for further distribution, and therefore the sales were not retail sales to the final consumer. Mere affixation of MRP did not, by itself, attract Section 4A, because the decisive requirement is a legal mandate to affix retail price and a qualifying retail sale.
Conclusion: The goods were not eligible for assessment under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the benefit of the notification was unavailable.