Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal revises tax assessment, limits addition on bogus purchases, upholds reopening under section 147.</h1> <h3>Challenger Computers Versus Income Tax Officer Ward–19 (1) (3), Mumbai</h3> The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11, restoring the matter to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration of ... Reopening of assessment - income for bogus purchases - HELD THAT:- AO received information from the DGIT (Inv.), Mumbai, as well as the Sales Tax Department, Government of Maharashtra, indicating that the assessee is a beneficiary of bogus purchase bills. On the basis of such information, which is a new and tangible material, AO had formed the belief that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment requiring re–opening of assessment under section 147 - Therefore, in view of the above, we uphold the re–opening of assessment under section 147 of the Act in the facts of the present case. Accordingly, ground no.1, raised in assessee’s appeal is dismissed. Estimation of income bogus purchases - As relying on Mohammad Haji Adam case [2019 (2) TMI 1632 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] we set aside the impugned order passed by the CIT(A) and restore the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer with the direction to restrict the addition as regard the bogus purchases by bringing the gross profit rate on such bogus purchases at the same rate as that of the other genuine purchase. We further direct that if the gross profit rate on bogus purchases is higher than the other genuine purchases and the same has already been offered to tax by the assessee then no further addition be made. Accordingly, grounds raised in assessee’s appeal are allowed for statistical purposes. Issues Involved:Challenging impugned orders under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11, re-opening of assessment under section 147, addition of profit element on alleged non-genuine purchases, jurisdiction invoked under section 147, levy of interest u/s 234B and 234C.Detailed Analysis:Re-opening of Assessment under Section 147:The appeals were filed challenging the orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The re-assessment proceedings were initiated based on information received indicating the assessee's involvement in bogus purchases. The Assessing Officer added 12.5% of the alleged non-genuine purchases to the total income of the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the re-opening of assessment under section 147 as new material was available, leading to the belief that income had escaped assessment.Addition of Profit Element on Non-Genuine Purchases:The Assessing Officer added the profit element on alleged non-genuine purchases despite not disputing the sales made by the assessee. The Tribunal referred to a similar case where it was held that when sales are not doubted, a hundred percent disallowance for bogus purchases cannot be made. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to restrict the addition by bringing the gross profit rate on bogus purchases at the same rate as that of other genuine purchases.Jurisdiction Invoked under Section 147:The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had conducted an independent inquiry and made the impugned addition based on the available material. The re-opening of assessment under section 147 was upheld as the Assessing Officer had formed a belief that income had escaped assessment.Levy of Interest u/s 234B and 234C:The issue of interest levied under sections 234B and 234C was deemed consequential in nature and allowed for statistical purposes.Conclusion:The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for both assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 for statistical purposes. The matter was restored to the file of the Assessing Officer with directions regarding the addition on bogus purchases. The appeals were allowed based on the Tribunal's findings and conclusions from the assessment year 2009-10, which were applied mutatis mutandis to the appeal for the assessment year 2010-11.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found