Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest relating to non-performing assets, reversed in the books in accordance with RBI norms, could be excluded from taxable income for the relevant assessment year and whether such amount could be claimed as a deduction or treated as a bad debt.
Analysis: The assessee had originally credited interest on advances on accrual basis, but later sought to reverse the amount when the advances became non-performing assets under RBI prudential norms. The Court held that while RBI guidelines bind banking companies for accounting purposes, assessment under the Income-tax Act, 1961 must be made in accordance with the Act itself. The Act is a self-contained code, and a deduction cannot be claimed unless it is specifically provided for. The assessee had not written off the amount as a bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the claim was not supported by Section 43D of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court also noted that the assessee could have pursued the appropriate statutory remedy by revised return or other timely claim.
Conclusion: The claim to exclude the reversed NPA interest from taxable income was held not permissible, and the assessee was not entitled to deduction on the basis asserted.