Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether copper scrap imported by the petitioner was liable to excise duty under Item 68 or Item 26A of the Central Excise Tariff as it stood prior to 1 April 1981, and whether the earlier Division Bench view required reconsideration.
Analysis: The order records that the question of classification of copper scrap under the tariff entries had been considered by other High Courts and that there was a conflicting view from an earlier Division Bench of the same Court. The Bench expressed a prima facie view that the earlier decision needed reconsideration and formulated the classification issue for consideration by a larger Bench.
Outcome: No final adjudication on the tariff classification was made. The papers were directed to be placed before the Chief Justice for appropriate orders.