TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Reconsideration of Copper Scrap excisability under Central Excise Tariff: Entry 68 prevails over Entry 26A.</h1> The High Court directed reconsideration of the excisability of Copper Scrap, instructing a larger bench to review whether it falls under Entry 68 or 26A ... Reference to Larger Bench when there are contrary decisions of two High Courts - Copper scrap The High Court of Bombay considered the excisability of Copper Scrap imported by the petitioner, questioning whether it falls under Item 68 or Item 26A of the Central Excise Tariff. The Assistant Collector of Customs had opined that Item 26A applied, but the petitioner challenged this decision. The Court found the Kerala High Court's decision supporting Entry 68 more acceptable and directed reconsideration of the previous decision by a larger bench. The issue to be considered is whether the importer of Copper Scrap is liable to pay excise duty under Entry 68 or 26A of the Central Excise Tariff as it stood before April 1, 1981.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
