Tribunal partially allows appeal, setting aside tax demands for furniture supply and road culverts.

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside tax demands related to furniture supply and strengthening culverts on roads, while remanding the issue of construction for GERMI for further consideration by the Adjudicating Authority.

---

---

Issues Involved:
(A) Classification of service under commercial construction for a university building.
(B) Tax demand justification for commercial or industrial construction services related to furniture supply.
(C) Tax liability for strengthening culverts under commercial or industrial construction services.
(D) Applicability of demand for an extended period.

Analysis:

(A) Classification of service under commercial construction for a university building:
The appellant argued that the construction for an educational university under a trust should not be considered commercial and taxed under commercial construction service. They contended that the service, if taxable, should fall under "works contract service." The Tribunal noted that the issue of works contract service was raised for the first time, requiring reconsideration. The judgment referred to various precedents to support this argument.

(B) Tax demand justification for commercial or industrial construction services related to furniture supply:
The Lower Authority had classified the supply of furniture as commercial construction and imposed a tax demand. However, the Tribunal disagreed, stating that the mere supply of ready-made furniture should not be considered a taxable service as it is akin to a sale of furniture. Therefore, the tax demand of Rs. 52,228 related to furniture supply was set aside.

(C) Tax liability for strengthening culverts under commercial or industrial construction services:
Regarding the demand of Rs. 34,483 for strengthening culverts on roads, the Tribunal ruled that such services directly connected to public roads are excluded from commercial or industrial construction services. Consequently, the demand for tax on this activity was deemed unsustainable and set aside.

(D) Applicability of demand for an extended period:
The judgment concluded that the appeal related to the tax demand for furniture supply and strengthening culverts on roads was allowed. However, the issue concerning the construction of a building for GERMI was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh order on all issues, indicating a partial allowance and remand of the appeal.

In summary, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside tax demands related to furniture supply and strengthening culverts on roads, while remanding the issue of construction for GERMI for further consideration by the Adjudicating Authority.

---