CENVAT credit remains available when inputs are removed as such or after partial processing, even without manufacture.

Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 allows credit to be used for duty payment when inputs are removed as such or after partial processing, and the expression "removed" is not limited to manufactured final products. Credit cannot be denied merely because galvanization or other processing does not amount to manufacture, where the scheme itself contemplates reversal or adjustment on clearance of inputs. On that basis, the credit already taken remained available and duty paid on such removals could be adjusted against it, so the revenue's challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether CENVAT credit could be denied merely because galvanization of C.R. coils did not amount to manufacture, and whether duty paid on inputs removed as such or after partial processing could be adjusted against the credit availed.

Analysis: Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 permits credit to a manufacturer or producer of final products and specifically allows utilization of such credit for payment of duty on inputs themselves if those inputs are removed as such or after being partially processed. The Court noted that sub-rules 3, 4 and 5 make the scheme clear: the expression "removed" is not confined to manufactured goods, and the rules contemplate reversal or payment on removal of inputs even where no manufacturing activity is ultimately found. Applying this framework, and following the reasoning approved in the cited precedent, the Court held that the respondent was entitled to the benefit of credit already taken and to adjustment of duty paid on the clearances.

Conclusion: The credit demand was not sustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The revenue's challenge failed because the CENVAT scheme permitted adjustment where inputs were removed as such or after partial processing, and the appeal was dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: Under Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002, CENVAT credit cannot be denied merely because the processing of inputs does not amount to manufacture, where the rules themselves permit payment of duty on inputs removed as such or after partial processing.

---