Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Judicial Discretion Prevails: Late GST Appeal Accepted Under Section 107 with Procedural Compliance Conditions</h1> <h3>Suraj Mangar Versus Assistant Commissioner of West Bengal State Tax, Cooch Behar Charge, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal & Ors.</h3> HC allowed appeal despite 36-day delay in filing under Section 107 of West Bengal GST Act, 2017. Court directed Appellate Authority to consider appeal on ... Rejection of petitioner’s appeal on the ground of delay in submission of Appeal - time limitation - HELD THAT:- Section 107 of The West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 deals with Appeals to Appellate Authority. Under Section 107(1), any person aggrieved by an order passed under this Act or the Central Goods and Services Tax Act by an adjudicating authority may file an appeal before the prescribed Appellate Authority within three months from the date on which the decision is communicated to such person. Sub-section (4) of Section 107 authorizes the Appellate Authority to allow the appeal to be presented within a further period of one month after the expiry of 3/6 months if the Appellate Authority is satisfied that the appellant was prevented from presenting the appeal within the aforesaid time period by sufficient cause. In the present case, there has been a delay of 36 days after three months + one month. The petitioner, through learned counsel, claims to have been ignorant of the statutory time period framed under the 2017 Act - Upon hearing learned counsel and considering the power of the Appellate Authority to extend the time period albeit within three + one month as well as the negligible period of delay, this court is of the view that the Appellate Authority should be directed to allow admission of the appeal on merits subject to the petitioner taking steps in terms of the Appeal by 11th January, 2023. Application disposed off. Issues: Delay in filing appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of The West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.In this case, the petitioner challenged an order of the Appellate Authority dated 29.08.2022, which rejected the petitioner's appeal due to a delay in submission. The relevant law, Section 107 of The West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, allows appeals to be filed within three months from the date of the communicated decision, with a provision for a further one-month extension in certain circumstances. The petitioner, represented by counsel, claimed ignorance of the statutory time period. The court noted a delay of 36 days beyond the prescribed period and considered the power of the Appellate Authority to extend the time limit. Despite the delay, the court directed the Appellate Authority to allow the appeal on merits, provided the petitioner took necessary steps by a specified date. The court clarified that it did not assess the merits of the case, leaving it to the Appellate Authority to decide based on facts and law. The petition was disposed of accordingly.This judgment highlights the importance of adhering to statutory time limits for filing appeals under tax laws. It underscores the discretion of the Appellate Authority to extend time in cases of sufficient cause, emphasizing the need for parties to be aware of and comply with legal timelines. The court's decision to grant relief despite the delay showcases a balance between procedural requirements and substantive justice, ensuring that the petitioner's appeal is considered on its merits. The judgment serves as a reminder for parties to diligently follow procedural rules while also recognizing the courts' role in upholding fairness and due process in legal proceedings.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found