Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on spares and accessories used in an adjacent unit was admissible when the manufacturing activity of both units was integrated and the final products were cleared on payment of duty from the registered unit.
Analysis: The disputed spares and accessories were used in the appellant's integrated manufacturing operations and were connected with the manufacture of excisable final products cleared from the registered unit. The objection that the goods were physically used in the adjacent unit was not ative, because the relevant test is whether the goods are used in or in relation to manufacture of the final product. The Tribunal also relied on its earlier decision in the appellant's own case and other similar rulings, noting that credit cannot be denied merely because the machinery or components are used in an adjoining premises, so long as they remain part of the assessee's manufacturing setup and are not alienated.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was admissible and the denial of credit was unsustainable; the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit is available where the goods or machinery are used in or in relation to manufacture of dutiable final products within an integrated manufacturing setup, even if the use occurs in an adjacent premises forming part of the assessee's manufacturing operations.