Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>ITAT Chennai partially allows appeal on MAT book profits computation under sec.115JB for AY 2008-09.</h1> <h3>M/s. Kavithalayaa Productions- (P) Ltd., Versus. The Asst. Commissionerof Income Tax, Media Circle-14,</h3> M/s. Kavithalayaa Productions- (P) Ltd., Versus. The Asst. Commissionerof Income Tax, Media Circle-14, - tmi Issues:1. Computation of book profits for the purpose of MAT under sec.115JB of IT Act 1961.2. Adjustments to book loss for assessment year 2008-09.3. Compliance with Companies Act 2003 and Accounting Standards of ICAI.4. Treatment of income for TDS credits under Accounting Standards.5. Treatment of prior period expenses while computing book profit under sec.115JB.Issue 1: Computation of book profits for the purpose of MAT under sec.115JB of IT Act 1961:The appeal challenged the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the computation of book profits for the assessment year 2008-09 under sec.115JB of the IT Act 1961. The appellant argued that adjustments made to re-compute the book loss or income under normal provisions of the IT Act for assessment purposes were not applicable to the computation of income for MAT purposes. The appellant contended that the adjustments made by the authorities were not in line with the provisions of sec.115JB, and the book profit computation should be restored as per the return filed.Issue 2: Adjustments to book loss for assessment year 2008-09:The appellant raised concerns regarding two adjustments made to re-compute the book loss or income for assessment year 2008-09. These adjustments included income admitted to claim TDS credits and the exclusion of prior period expenses. The appellant argued that these adjustments were permissible under the normal provisions of the IT Act 1961 but were not applicable for computing income liable for assessment under sec.115JB of the Act. The appellant sought the deletion of these additions to restore the income computed by the assessee for tax liability purposes.Issue 3: Compliance with Companies Act 2003 and Accounting Standards of ICAI:The appellant emphasized the importance of maintaining accounts in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2003 and the Accounting Standards of ICAI. The appellant argued that the adjustments made by the authorities were not in line with the mandatory requirements for maintaining company accounts, which should have limited the adjustments permissible for computing book profits under sec.115JB of the IT Act.Issue 4: Treatment of income for TDS credits under Accounting Standards:The appellant contested the treatment of income offered for TDS credits, arguing that it should not be considered as income for the assessment year under sec.115JB. The appellant highlighted that Accounting Standards recognize income only when it has accrued during the previous year, and thus, the treatment of TDS credits income should align with these standards.Issue 5: Treatment of prior period expenses while computing book profit under sec.115JB:The appellant challenged the disallowance of prior period expenses while computing book profit under sec.115JB of the IT Act 1961. The appellant argued that the treatment of prior period expenses should follow the Accounting Standards, which allow debiting such expenses to the profit & loss account of a subsequent year. The appellant contended that the disallowance of prior period expenses did not align with the provisions of sec.115JB and the adjustments specified in Explanation (1) to the section.In conclusion, the ITAT Chennai partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the additions made towards income admitted for TDS credits while computing book profit under sec.115JB. However, the additions made towards prior period expenses were sustained as the appellant's treatment did not comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 2003 and Accounting Standards.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found