Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court protects Petitioner's benefits under Sabka Vishwas Scheme despite post-June 2019 investigations.</h1> <h3>Access Platform Equipments Limited Versus The Union of India, The Principal Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise & Service Tax, Mumbai, The Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Belapur, The Designated Committee, CGST, Central Excise & Service Tax, Navi Mumbai, Joint Commissioner CGST, Central Excise & Service Tax Belapur Commissionerate,</h3> The Court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, holding that investigations initiated after 30 June 2019 should not disqualify them from availing benefits ... Benefit under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 denied - denial on the ground that investigation is pending against the Petitioner - HELD THAT:- The Division Bench of this Court, in the case of M/S. NEW INDIA CIVIL ERECTORS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [2021 (3) TMI 545 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT], has dealt with this stand of the Respondents that for the category of voluntary disclosure under Section 125 of the Finance Act, there is no mention to the date of 30 June 2019, and have held that, by adopting liberal interpretation, it will have to be held that the pendency of the investigation/enquiry on 30 June 2019 referred to Section 125 of the Act of 2019 is also relevant for the voluntary disclosure category under Section 125 (1)(f)(i) of the Act of 2019. The impugned rejections of the declarations filed by the Petitioner on 15 January 2020 under the Scheme of 2019 are quashed and set aside. The Respondents will process the declarations filed by the Petitioner for the years 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18 as per law and pass necessary orders within a period of eight weeks from the date order is uploaded. Petition allowed. Issues:1. Denial of benefit under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme due to pending investigation.2. Interpretation of Section 125(1)(f)(i) of the Finance Act, 2019 regarding voluntary disclosure.3. Rejection of declarations under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme for specific financial years.4. Legal implications of investigation initiation post 30 June 2019.Analysis:1. The Petitioner sought relief under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, which was denied due to an ongoing investigation against them. The Petitioner contended that the investigation was initiated after 30 June 2019, making them eligible for the scheme as per Section 125(1)(f)(i) of the Finance Act, 2019.2. The crux of the issue revolved around the interpretation of Section 125(1)(f)(i) of the Finance Act, 2019. The Petitioner argued that the relevant date for determining eligibility under the voluntary disclosure category was 30 June 2019, and any investigation initiated post that date should not disqualify them from availing the benefits of the scheme.3. The Petitioner filed declarations under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme for the financial years 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18, categorizing them as 'Voluntary Disclosure.' However, these declarations were repeatedly rejected by the Designated Committee citing ongoing investigations as the reason for ineligibility.4. The Court referred to previous judgments, including the case of New India Civil Erectors Pvt. Ltd. and UCC Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., where it was held that the pendency of investigation/enquiry as of 30 June 2019 was crucial for determining eligibility under the voluntary disclosure category of Section 125(1)(f)(i) of the Finance Act, 2019. The Court emphasized that investigations initiated after the specified date should not render the declarant ineligible for the scheme.5. Consequently, the Court quashed the rejections of the Petitioner's declarations under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme and directed the Respondents to process the declarations for the relevant financial years in accordance with the law within eight weeks. The Court also allayed the Petitioner's concerns regarding coercive actions by the Respondents, stating that no action would be taken based on the rejected declarations.In conclusion, the judgment favored the Petitioner by interpreting the relevant provisions of the Finance Act, 2019 in their favor, allowing them to avail the benefits of the Sabka Vishwas Scheme despite the ongoing investigation initiated post the crucial date of 30 June 2019.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found