Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2023 (1) TMI 1192 - AT - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeal challenging NCLT's order to reject winding-up petition dismissed due to procedural lapses and lack of sanction The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the NCLT's order, which had rejected the winding-up petition against the Respondent company. Citing ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Appeal challenging NCLT's order to reject winding-up petition dismissed due to procedural lapses and lack of sanction

                          The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the NCLT's order, which had rejected the winding-up petition against the Respondent company. Citing similarities to a previous case, the Tribunal emphasized procedural lapses and lack of proper sanction as key reasons for the dismissal. The Appellant's allegations of money laundering, control by Jain Brothers, and validity of the sanction letter were considered in light of the precedent, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Legality of the impugned order dated 03.02.2020 by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi.
                          2. Allegations of money laundering and fraudulent activities by the Respondent company.
                          3. Validity of the sanction letter dated 29.08.2017.
                          4. The role of Jain Brothers in controlling the Respondent company.
                          5. Applicability of the judgment in the case of "Registrar of Companies Vs. Apoorva Leasing Finance & Investment Company Limited".

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Legality of the Impugned Order:
                          The Appellant challenged the legality of the NCLT's order dated 03.02.2020, which dismissed the winding-up petition against the Respondent company. The Tribunal dismissed the petition on the grounds of lack of sanction and on merits, referencing a similar case, "Registrar of Companies Vs. Apoorva Leasing Finance And Investment Company Ltd."

                          2. Allegations of Money Laundering:
                          The Appellant's case was based on the SFIO Report dated 31.03.2016, which found that the Respondent company, along with 48 other companies controlled by Jain Brothers, was involved in money laundering activities. The SFIO investigation revealed that these companies were used for rotating money through book entries without any purposeful business, and the Jain Brothers were the "Directing mind and will" behind these activities.

                          3. Validity of the Sanction Letter:
                          The Appellant argued that the letter dated 29.08.2017 was a valid sanction letter issued after due discussion and deliberation. The Tribunal, however, found that the sanction order did not contain allegations against the Respondent company or indicate that the company had been given a reasonable opportunity to make representations. This was supported by a previous judgment in "Registrar of Companies Vs. Apoorva Leasing Finance & Investment Company Limited," where it was held that the sanction was granted without applying the mind and without giving reasonable opportunity of representation.

                          4. Role of Jain Brothers:
                          The Appellant contended that the Respondent company was still under the influence of Jain Brothers, despite a change in management in 2015-16. The SFIO report and other investigations indicated that the Jain Brothers controlled the Respondent company and other entities through a web of transactions and shell companies, facilitating money laundering activities.

                          5. Applicability of the Judgment in "Registrar of Companies Vs. Apoorva Leasing Finance & Investment Company Limited":
                          The Tribunal referenced the judgment in "Registrar of Companies Vs. Apoorva Leasing Finance & Investment Company Limited," which was upheld by the NCLAT and the Supreme Court. The Tribunal found that the facts of the instant appeal were identical to this case, where the appeal was dismissed due to lack of proper sanction and procedural lapses. The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal on the grounds of limitation but clarified that the order would not prevent the appellant from taking recourse to remedies available in law after following due process.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal concluded that the facts of the instant appeal were identical to the case of "Registrar of Companies Vs. Apoorva Leasing Finance & Investment Company Limited," which had been dismissed by the NCLAT and upheld by the Supreme Court. Therefore, the Tribunal found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it, reinforcing that the procedural lapses and lack of proper sanction were critical in the dismissal of the winding-up petition.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found