Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (1) TMI 1170 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal adjusts net profit estimation, reducing assessed income for assessee in appeal The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal by adjusting the net profit estimation from 5% to 2.5% of turnover for the assessment year. Despite ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tribunal adjusts net profit estimation, reducing assessed income for assessee in appeal

                              The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal by adjusting the net profit estimation from 5% to 2.5% of turnover for the assessment year. Despite the assessee's acceptance of the 5% estimation due to financial constraints, the Tribunal considered past profit rates and lack of defects in the provided details to grant relief. The adjustment resulted in a net profit of Rs.18,92,912/-, significantly reducing the assessed income and providing substantial relief to the assessee.




                              Issues:
                              Estimation of net profit at 5% by the Assessing Officer, Acceptance of the estimation by the assessee, Appeal against the estimation of net profit, Comparison with past profit rates, Relief sought by the assessee.

                              Estimation of Net Profit at 5%:
                              The case involved an appeal by the assessee against the estimation of net profit at 5% of the turnover by the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer based this estimation on the letter dated 09.03.2015, where the assessee agreed to the proposed 5% estimation due to financial constraints. The assessee had declared a loss of Rs.21,39,561/-, and the turnover was Rs.7,57,16,480/-. The Assessing Officer did not find any specific defects in the details provided by the assessee but issued a show-cause notice for estimating the net profit at 5% due to the unavailability of the books of account. The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer did not refer to comparable cases or the past profit history of the assessee.

                              Acceptance of Estimation by the Assessee:
                              The Tribunal considered the financial data from the audited balance-sheets of the preceding two years, where the net profit rates were 1.16% for A.Y. 2009-10 and 1.11% for A.Y. 2010-11. Despite the inability of the assessee to provide additional details and the absence of specific defects in the filed information, the Tribunal decided to estimate the net profit at 2.5% instead of the 5% confirmed by the CIT(Appeals). This adjustment resulted in a net profit of Rs.18,92,912/- for A.Y. 2011-12, providing relief to the assessee of Rs.18,92,912/-.

                              Appeal Against the Estimation of Net Profit:
                              The assessee appealed before the Tribunal after failing to succeed with the CIT(Appeals), who upheld the 5% net profit estimation. The Tribunal considered the past profit rates of the assessee, the absence of specific defects in the provided details, and the financial constraints mentioned by the assessee in accepting the 5% estimation. Ultimately, the Tribunal decided to partially allow the appeal by estimating the net profit at 2.5% instead of 5%, providing significant relief to the assessee.

                              Comparison with Past Profit Rates:
                              The Tribunal analyzed the past profit rates of the assessee from audited financial statements for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11, where the net profit rates were significantly lower than the 5% estimation made by the Assessing Officer. This comparison, along with the lack of specific defects in the details provided by the assessee, influenced the Tribunal's decision to adjust the net profit estimation to 2.5%, resulting in a substantial reduction in the assessed income for A.Y. 2011-12.

                              Relief Sought by the Assessee:
                              The assessee sought relief from the estimation of net profit at 5% due to suffering significant losses in the relevant year. The Tribunal considered the financial data, past profit rates, and the absence of specific defects in the details provided by the assessee while granting relief by adjusting the net profit estimation to 2.5%. This adjustment provided substantial relief to the assessee and partially allowed the appeal against the initial estimation made by the Assessing Officer.

                              This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues involved, the arguments presented by the parties, and the Tribunal's decision regarding the estimation of net profit for the relevant assessment year.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found