Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to a judicial direction permitting filing of Form GST ITC-01 after the prescribed period and whether the prayer should instead be considered by the Commissioner, State Tax under the power to extend time under Rule 40(1)(b) of the JGST Rules, 2017.
Analysis: The dispute arose from the petitioner's inability to file Form GST ITC-01 within time on account of an asserted portal error, while the State Tax authorities had also indicated that the grievance was taken up with GSTN. The relevant rule provided for filing of the declaration within thirty days of eligibility and also permitted extension of time by the Commissioner by notification. On the facts, the matter was treated as a borderline case and the Court declined to record a conclusive interpretation of the rule at that stage. Instead, the petitioner was directed to place a representation before the Commissioner, State Tax, who was to consider the request in accordance with law within the stipulated period.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not granted direct permission to file Form GST ITC-01 through the writ petition, and was relegated to seek extension of time before the Commissioner, State Tax.