TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Credit Transition Under GST Act Upheld: Review Petition Dismissed After Careful Examination of Legal Precedents</h1> <h3>M/s. Hero Motocorp Ltd. Versus Union Of India & Ors.</h3> HC dismissed review petition challenging prior order regarding credit transition under GST Act. Court upheld original directions based on established ... Seeking reopening of portal to file TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 - Transition of unutilized credit in respect of Input Service Distribution (ISD) - HELD THAT:- Since this position was recognized, the prayers made in the writ petition were allowed, not as a matter of concession, but because of the position of law as declared by the judgments referred to in paragraph 4 of M/S HERO MOTOCORP LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. [2022 (9) TMI 1409 - DELHI HIGH COURT] where it was held that the issue stands covered by UNICHEM LABORATORIES LIMITED, CASTROL INDIA LIMITED AND ANR. NIVEA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, PFIZER LIMITED AND SIEMENS HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS [2022 (9) TMI 258 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT], COLGATE PALMOLIVE (I) LIMITED VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. [2022 (8) TMI 1282 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] and M/S BODAL CHEMICALS LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA [2022 (2) TMI 846 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] where it was held that The Hon’ble Apex Court, to aid the assessees to overcome the procedural/technical hurdles, by the order UNION OF INDIA & ANR. VERSUS FILCO TRADE CENTRE PVT. LTD. & ANR. [2022 (7) TMI 1232 - SC ORDER] directed the GST Network to open the common portal to file/rectify TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 for a period of two months, i.e., with effect from 1st September, 2022 to 31st October, 2022 to enable the different private parties to avail Transitional Credit. Since, we were in agreement with the ratio of those judgments, we allowed the relief prayed for by the writ petitioner. Petition allowed. Issues:Review of directions in the order dated 10.10.2022 concerning the instruction dated 05.07.2018.Analysis:The review petition was filed by respondent no.4/applicant regarding the directions in paragraph 3 of the order dated 10.10.2022. The order dated 10.10.2022 was a continuation of the proceedings from 19.09.2022, where a typographical error was noted in referring to the instruction dated 05.07.2018 instead of 05.02.2017. The respondent no.4/applicant cannot claim ignorance of the challenge to the instruction dated 05.07.2018, as it was mentioned in the impugned communication dated 04.02.2019. The petitioner was not allowed to transition unutilized credit due to the instruction dated 05.07.2018, which was found to be misaligned with previous court judgments allowing such transitions under Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The relief granted in the writ petition was based on the legal position established by previous judgments. Respondent no.4/applicant acknowledged that the petitioner was entitled to relief based on a Supreme Court judgment.In conclusion, the court found that a review of the order dated 10.10.2022 was unnecessary, as the relief granted was in accordance with established legal principles and previous court judgments. The review petition/application was closed accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
