Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Court denies duty exemption on imported coal for captive power plant; plant didn't meet export criteria.</h1> <h3>INDIAN CHARGE CHROME LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA</h3> INDIAN CHARGE CHROME LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA - 1992 (60) E.L.T. 191 (Ori.) Issues:1. Whether coal imported for a captive power plant is exempt from customs duties under a specific government notification for 100% export-oriented undertakings.Analysis:The petitioner set up a plant for manufacturing charge-chrome and ferro-chrome, with a captive power plant for electricity generation. The government resolution aimed at boosting exports provided concessions for 100% export-oriented units, exempting certain imports from customs duties. The petitioner argued that coal imported for the captive power plant should be considered a raw material or consumable for manufacturing charge-chrome, thus eligible for duty exemption under the notification.The government approved the petitioner's 100% export-oriented undertaking and permitted the import of capital goods, including power generation equipment for the captive power plant. The petitioner contended that since the power generation equipment was allowed duty-free import, coal for the power plant should also be exempt. However, the Customs authorities argued that coal for power generation does not qualify as a raw material or consumable for manufacturing charge-chrome under the notification.The Court held that the captive power plant was not considered a 100% export-oriented undertaking approved by the Board, thus not eligible for duty exemptions under the notification. While the power generation equipment was permitted duty-free import, coal for power generation did not meet the criteria for duty exemption as a raw material or consumable for manufacturing charge-chrome. Therefore, the Court dismissed the writ application, ruling against the petitioner's claim for duty exemption on imported coal for the captive power plant.