TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Notice to Reopen Income Tax Assessment Year 2013-14 Ruled Time-Barred</h1> <h3>Rubina Senapati Versus Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre (NeFAC) And others</h3> The High Court of Orissa held that a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to reopen the Assessment Year 2013-14 on 31st March, 2021 ... Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - period of limitation - notice beyond the period of six years - HELD THAT:- The impugned notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen the Assessment Year for 2013-14, was issued on 31st March, 2021 which is beyond the period of six years of the close of the Assessment Year and therefore, it is clearly time-barred. On the above short ground, the impugned notice dated 31st March, 2021 as well as all consequential proceedings thereto including the Assessment order dated 30th March, 2022 and the consequential demand are hereby quashed. Writ petition is allowed. The High Court of Orissa ruled that a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to reopen the Assessment Year 2013-14 on 31st March, 2021 was time-barred as it exceeded the six-year limit. Consequently, the notice, assessment order, and demand were quashed. The writ petition was allowed accordingly.
TaxTMI 
