Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the company's name, struck off from the register for non-filing of annual returns and financial statements, ought to be restored when the record showed subsisting assets and business activity.
Analysis: The appeal challenged the rejection of restoration under the company law mechanism governing striking off and restoration of names from the register. The record showed that sale deeds stood in the company's name, audited balance sheets were available for the relevant years, and income tax returns had been filed for later years. On those materials, the company could not be treated as a non-operational entity. Mere defaults in filing statutory returns, without more, did not justify continuation of the striking-off order where the company's existence, assets, and business purpose were established.
Conclusion: The striking-off action was held unsustainable and the company's name was directed to be restored, subject to compliance with the specified conditions and costs.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and restoration of the company in the register was ordered, with consequential filing and payment obligations imposed on the company.
Ratio Decidendi: A company cannot be treated as defunct for striking-off purposes where contemporaneous material shows substantial assets and ongoing business activity, and restoration is justified despite filing defaults.