Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal directs fair hearing for deduction under section 80P ensuring procedural fairness</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Ld.PCIT to provide the assessee with a fair opportunity to be heard and cooperate ... Revision u/s 263 by CIT - disallowance of claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Act with respect to interest income accrued / received on the fixed deposits made with State Bank of India - HELD THAT:- As undisputed fact that the assessee society’s case for the Asst.Year 2017-18 was selected for limited scrutiny only with the reason to verify deduction under Chapter VIA of the I.T.Act and such verification was done by the then AO in the scrutiny assessment proceedings and assessment order dated 10.12.2019 u/s 143(3) was passed by accepting the claim of deduction u/s 80P and by accepting the income returned by the assessee society. As AR contended that the assessee society invested in fixed deposits with State Bank of India only as stopgap arrangement to earn some income on the then surplus funds and it was clearly incidental income, eligible for deduction u/s 80P and one more opportunity may be given to the assessee to furnish it’s explanation before the Ld.PCIT for which the Ld.DR has not raised any objection. Considering all we are of the view that it is a fit case to grant one more opportunity of being heard to the assessee - we direct the Ld.PCIT to pass order after giving opportunity of being heard to the assessee and the assessee is also directed to cooperate with the Ld.PCIT - Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Issues:Dispute over deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act for interest income earned on fixed deposits made with State Bank of India.Analysis:1. The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessee, a Primary Farmers Service Co-operative Society, declared NIL taxable income after claiming deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The issue arose when the Ld.PCIT observed that the assessee had claimed TDS on interest income earned from fixed deposits with State Bank of India, which was also included in the total income claimed for deduction under section 80P. However, as per section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, deduction is allowed only for income derived from investments with other cooperative societies. The Ld.PCIT held the assessee ineligible for deduction on the interest income from fixed deposits and deemed the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, leading to a revision under section 263 of the Act.2. The assessee raised multiple grounds in appeal, arguing that the interest income from fixed deposits was incidental to its business and thus eligible for deduction under section 80P. The Ld.AR contended that the fixed deposits were a stopgap arrangement to earn income on surplus funds and should be considered incidental income. The Ld.DR supported the Ld.PCIT's decision, stating that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. After hearing both parties, the Tribunal noted that the assessing officer had accepted the deduction under section 80P during the initial assessment. Considering the principles of natural justice, the Tribunal granted the assessee another opportunity to present its case before the Ld.PCIT, setting aside the previous order and remitting the matter back for reconsideration.3. The Tribunal's decision allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for the Ld.PCIT to provide the assessee with a fair opportunity to be heard and cooperate in furnishing all necessary details. The order aimed to ensure procedural fairness and adherence to natural justice principles in resolving the dispute over the deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act related to interest income earned on fixed deposits with State Bank of India.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found