Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the petitioner made out a case for interim protection against coercive recovery action pending filing of counter affidavit; (ii) Whether the interlocutory application for ignoring the defect and exemption from filing certified copy of the appellate order deserved to be disposed of.
Analysis: The writ petition challenged reassessment proceedings initiated under section 17(2) read with section 19(1) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, with the petitioner contending that the notice dated 12.01.2009 was not in the statutory Form XIV prescribed under Rule 20 of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983 and that coercive steps were apprehended in view of the demand notice. The Court granted the State time to file counter affidavit and, in the meantime, considered it appropriate to protect the petitioner from coercive action on a condition of deposit of part of the tax demand. The defect in filing was also ignored and the interlocutory application was disposed of.
Conclusion: Interim protection against coercive steps was granted subject to deposit of 20% of the tax demand, and the interlocutory applications were disposed of.