Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants, accused of offences under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, were entitled to regular bail in view of the completion of investigation, prolonged custody, and the nature of the alleged punishment.
Analysis: The applicants were in custody for about 23 months. The complaint had already been filed, the investigation was stated to be complete, and charges had not yet been framed. The maximum punishment for the alleged offence was five years and no minimum sentence was prescribed. In these circumstances, and without entering into the merits of the allegations, continued detention pending trial was considered unjustified.
Conclusion: Regular bail was granted to the applicants.