Writ Petition Seeks Stay on Recovery, Court Advises Section 220(6) Application The Writ Petition sought to restrain coercive recovery measures for assessed amounts from 1998-99 to 2002-03. The Petitioner's pending appeal and refund ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The Writ Petition sought to restrain coercive recovery measures for assessed amounts from 1998-99 to 2002-03. The Petitioner's pending appeal and refund due for 2021-22 raised concerns about set-off. The Court advised filing a stay application under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 within a week, with a decision within ten days. The order did not address the case's merits. The Petitioner was directed to promptly seek protection under Section 220(6), with no costs awarded, emphasizing timely resolution and adherence to legal procedures.
Issues: - Coercive steps for recovery of assessed amounts for multiple years - Pending appeal against assessment orders - Threat of coercive steps to recover refund due for a different assessment year - Revenue's adjustment of refunds for some years - Petitioner's right to seek protection under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Analysis: The Writ Petition seeks to restrain the 2nd Respondent from taking coercive measures to recover amounts assessed for the years 1998-99 to 2002-03. The Petitioner's counsel highlights a total demand of Rs.67,72,869 for these years and mentions a pending appeal before the 1st Respondent. Additionally, a refund of Rs.1,91,81,434 is due to the Petitioner for the assessment year 2021-22, raising concerns about potential set-off against the liabilities under appeal.
The Respondents' Senior Standing Counsel mentions that the Revenue has already adjusted some refunds, although specific details are not provided. In response, the Court suggests that the Petitioner can seek protection under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by filing a stay application pending appeal within a week. Any such application will be decided within ten days, without affecting previous adjustments. Importantly, the Court clarifies that its order does not imply a stance on the case's merits, leaving it to the Respondents to evaluate independently.
In conclusion, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction for the Petitioner to pursue protection under Section 220(6) promptly. No costs are awarded, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed, emphasizing the need for timely resolution and adherence to legal procedures in addressing the issues raised in the petition.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.