GST natural justice and transitional credit window: summary notices without hearing were invalid, and TRAN-1/TRAN-2 revisions were permitted.

Summary notes that under the Jharkhand GST regime, adverse adjudication could not rest only on summary notices in Form GST DRC-01 where proper show-cause notice, effective opportunity to reply, service, and personal hearing were not afforded; on that footing, the DRC-01, DRC-07, adjudication orders, and consequential proceedings were quashed. It also records that transitional credit claims in TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 could be revisited within the window opened by the Supreme Court in FILCO Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. and the related GST circular, with any fresh departmental scrutiny required to proceed through a valid notice and lawful procedure.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the summary show-cause notices and consequential adjudication orders under the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 were liable to be quashed for want of proper notice, service, and personal hearing in compliance with the statutory procedure and principles of natural justice; (ii) Whether the petitioners were entitled to revisit or revise their TRAN-1 / TRAN-2 declarations for transitional credit in view of the Supreme Court's directions in FILCO Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. and the related GST circular.

Issue (i): Whether the summary show-cause notices and consequential adjudication orders under the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 were liable to be quashed for want of proper notice, service, and personal hearing in compliance with the statutory procedure and principles of natural justice.

Analysis: The challenge was founded on the absence of proper show-cause notices under Section 73, the use of only summary notices in Form GST DRC-01, and the failure to afford effective opportunity of reply and personal hearing before passing the adverse orders. The record showed that the petitioners were proceeded against on the basis of summary notices and that personal hearing was not granted. Such a course was held to be inconsistent with the procedure contemplated under the Act and Rules, and contrary to the requirement of fair hearing before an adverse adjudication.

Conclusion: The notices in Form GST DRC-01, the summary orders in Form GST DRC-07, the adjudication orders, and all consequential orders were quashed and set aside.

Issue (ii): Whether the petitioners were entitled to revisit or revise their TRAN-1 / TRAN-2 declarations for transitional credit in view of the Supreme Court's directions in FILCO Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. and the related GST circular.

Analysis: The petitioners' right to file or revise TRAN-1 / TRAN-2 was considered in light of the Supreme Court's directions opening the common portal for transitional-credit claims and revisions, as extended up to 30.11.2022. The subsequent GST circular also required verification of transitional credit claims in accordance with those directions. The petitioners were therefore entitled to avail the benefit of the extended window and, if necessary, the department could proceed afresh only after proper scrutiny and issuance of a valid notice in accordance with law.

Conclusion: The petitioners were held entitled to file revised TRAN-1 / TRAN-2 within the permitted window period and to have their claims dealt with in accordance with law.

Final Conclusion: The writ applications succeeded, the impugned GST proceedings were invalidated for procedural non-compliance, and the petitioners were left at liberty to pursue transitional-credit relief under the extended portal directions.

Ratio Decidendi: An adverse GST adjudication cannot be sustained unless proper notice, effective opportunity of reply, and personal hearing are afforded in the manner prescribed by the statute, and transitional-credit claims must be allowed to be revisited where the competent authority or court has opened a lawful revision window.

---