1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Court directs petitioner to appear before Assistant Collector for excise duty classification. Installment payment ordered with warning.</h1> The court directed the petitioner to appear before the Assistant Collector to decide the classification of goods for excise duty. The court found the ... Natural justice - Classification of goods Issues: Classification of goods for excise duty, payment of adjudicated duty, installment paymentThe judgment addresses the issue of the classification of goods for excise duty. The petitioner, a private limited company dealing with vegetable and non-essential oils, submitted a classification list stating that refining oil did not involve manufacturing activity. The Superintendent of Central Excise returned the list, prompting the petitioner to file a writ petition seeking to quash the order. The court directed the petitioner to appear before the Assistant Collector to decide the classification after hearing him, following a similar decision by the Division Bench at Jaipur. The Assistant Collector was instructed to make a decision within ten days.Regarding the payment of the adjudicated duty, the respondent argued that the petitioner had not paid the amount, totaling Rs. 40,47,477.75. The petitioner expressed willingness to pay the amount without prejudice to pending appeals and requested a reasonable time for installment payment. The court found the request reasonable and directed the petitioner to deposit the amount within six months in easy installments.The judgment concludes by disposing of the writ petition accordingly, vacating the stay order, and warning that if the petitioner defaults on two consecutive installment payments, the installment order will not be operative.