Marketability is essential for central excise duty on fabricated project-specific structures lacking open-market sale potential.

Fabrication of duty-paid iron and steel items by cutting, bending, welding and drilling does not by itself create dutiable excisable goods unless the result is a commercially known product capable of sale in the open market. The Court applied the settled principle that marketability is an essential ingredient of central excise liability and found that the project-specific components made exclusively for particular hydroelectric projects were not shown to be marketable as such. On that basis, the items were held not liable to central excise duty and the order treating them as excisable goods was quashed, with consequential relief on the amount deposited.

---

---

Issues: Whether the fabrication activities undertaken on duty-paid iron and steel items at the workshop amounted to manufacture of excisable goods liable to central excise duty; and whether the fabricated items, being designed for specific hydroelectric projects, satisfied the test of marketability.

Analysis: The relevant inquiry was whether the goods emerging from cutting, bending, welding, drilling and allied processes were capable of being sold in the open market as identifiable commodities. Excise duty is attracted only when manufacture results in goods that are marketable, and marketability remains an essential ingredient of liability. The fabricated items in question were project-specific structures and components, designed exclusively for particular hydroelectric projects, with no material to show that they were capable of sale in the open market as such. On that basis, the reasoning applied the settled principle that goods which are not marketable do not attract excise duty merely because fabrication has taken place.

Conclusion: The fabricated items were not shown to be marketable goods and were not liable to central excise duty.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order treating the fabricated project-specific items as excisable goods was quashed and the writ petition was allowed, with consequential relief regarding the amount deposited.

Ratio Decidendi: For central excise, manufacture becomes dutiable only if it results in goods that are commercially known and capable of sale in the market; project-specific fabricated structures lacking marketability are not exigible.

---